1947 Austin 16 vs. 1984 Autobianchi A 112
To start off, 1984 Autobianchi A 112 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Austin 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Austin 16 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1947 Austin 16 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1947 Austin 16 weights approximately 620 kg more than 1984 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 1947 Austin 16 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1947 Austin 16. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1947 Austin 16 | 1984 Autobianchi A 112 | |
Make | Austin | Autobianchi |
Model | 16 | A 112 |
Year Released | 1947 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 963 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 121 km/hour | 150 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 3280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2050 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 30 L |