1947 Austin 16 vs. 1999 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1999 Ford Mustang is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Austin 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Austin 16 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1947 Austin 16 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1947 Austin 16 weights approximately 72 kg more than 1999 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Mustang (160 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1947 Austin 16. (146 Nm). This means 1999 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1947 Austin 16.
Compare all specifications:
1947 Austin 16 | 1999 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | 16 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1947 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 1753 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 160 Nm |
Top Speed | 121 km/hour | 321 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1208 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 68 L |