1947 Austin 16 vs. 1999 Seat Cordoba
To start off, 1999 Seat Cordoba is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Austin 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Austin 16 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1947 Austin 16 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Seat Cordoba (123 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1947 Austin 16. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Seat Cordoba should accelerate faster than 1947 Austin 16.
Because 1947 Austin 16 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1947 Austin 16. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Seat Cordoba, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Seat Cordoba (321 Nm) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 1947 Austin 16. (146 Nm). This means 1999 Seat Cordoba will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1947 Austin 16.
Compare all specifications:
1947 Austin 16 | 1999 Seat Cordoba | |
Make | Austin | Seat |
Model | 16 | Cordoba |
Year Released | 1947 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 321 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2520 mm |