1947 Austin 16 vs. 2000 Fiat Siena
To start off, 2000 Fiat Siena is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Austin 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Austin 16 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1947 Austin 16 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1947 Austin 16 (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2000 Fiat Siena. (51 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1947 Austin 16 should accelerate faster than 2000 Fiat Siena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Fiat Siena weights approximately 20 kg more than 1947 Austin 16.
Because 1947 Austin 16 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1947 Austin 16. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Fiat Siena, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Fiat Siena (200 Nm) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1947 Austin 16. (146 Nm). This means 2000 Fiat Siena will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1947 Austin 16.
Compare all specifications:
1947 Austin 16 | 2000 Fiat Siena | |
Make | Austin | Fiat |
Model | 16 | Siena |
Year Released | 1947 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 1910 cc |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 200 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1300 kg |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 65 L |