1947 Austin 16 vs. 2000 Matra-Simca M72
To start off, 2000 Matra-Simca M72 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Austin 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Austin 16 would be higher. In terms of performance, 1947 Austin 16 (63 HP) has 13 more horse power than 2000 Matra-Simca M72. (50 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1947 Austin 16 should accelerate faster than 2000 Matra-Simca M72.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Matra-Simca M72 has automatic transmission and 1947 Austin 16 has manual transmission. 1947 Austin 16 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Matra-Simca M72 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1947 Austin 16 | 2000 Matra-Simca M72 | |
| Make | Austin | Matra-Simca |
| Model | 16 | M72 |
| Year Released | 1947 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Horse Power | 63 HP | 50 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
