1947 Austin 16 vs. 2000 Renault Clio
To start off, 2000 Renault Clio is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Austin 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Austin 16 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1947 Austin 16 weights approximately 345 kg more than 2000 Renault Clio.
Because 1947 Austin 16 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1947 Austin 16. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1947 Austin 16 | 2000 Renault Clio | |
Make | Austin | Renault |
Model | 16 | Clio |
Year Released | 1947 | 2000 |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 935 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 50 L |