1947 Austin 16 vs. 2006 Smart ForFour

To start off, 2006 Smart ForFour is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Austin 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Austin 16 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1947 Austin 16 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Smart ForFour (75 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1947 Austin 16. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Smart ForFour should accelerate faster than 1947 Austin 16.

Because 1947 Austin 16 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1947 Austin 16. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Smart ForFour, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1947 Austin 16 (146 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Smart ForFour. (136 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1947 Austin 16 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Smart ForFour.

Compare all specifications:

1947 Austin 16 2006 Smart ForFour
Make Austin Smart
Model 16 ForFour
Year Released 1947 2006
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2200 cc 1123 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 63 HP 75 HP
Engine RPM 3800 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 146 Nm 136 Nm
Torque RPM 2200 RPM 3500 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 6.8:1 10.5:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4350 mm 3760 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1680 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 2660 mm 2510 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 22 L