1947 Austin 16 vs. 2006 SsangYong Stavic
To start off, 2006 SsangYong Stavic is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Austin 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Austin 16 would be higher. At 3,197 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 SsangYong Stavic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 SsangYong Stavic (217 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 154 more horse power than 1947 Austin 16. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 SsangYong Stavic should accelerate faster than 1947 Austin 16.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 SsangYong Stavic (312 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 1947 Austin 16. (146 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2006 SsangYong Stavic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1947 Austin 16. 2006 SsangYong Stavic has automatic transmission and 1947 Austin 16 has manual transmission. 1947 Austin 16 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 SsangYong Stavic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1947 Austin 16 | 2006 SsangYong Stavic | |
Make | Austin | SsangYong |
Model | 16 | Stavic |
Year Released | 1947 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 3197 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 312 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.4 mm | 89.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 6.8:1 | 10.0:1 |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 80 L |