1947 Austin 16 vs. 2008 Smart Ultimate 112
To start off, 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Austin 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Austin 16 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 (110 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1947 Austin 16. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 should accelerate faster than 1947 Austin 16.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 (151 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1947 Austin 16. (146 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1947 Austin 16. 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 has automatic transmission and 1947 Austin 16 has manual transmission. 1947 Austin 16 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1947 Austin 16 | 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 | |
Make | Austin | Smart |
Model | 16 | Ultimate 112 |
Year Released | 1947 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 151 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1570 mm |