1947 Austin 16 vs. 2009 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2009 Lotus Evora is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Austin 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Austin 16 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Lotus Evora is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Lotus Evora (276 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 213 more horse power than 1947 Austin 16. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 1947 Austin 16.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Lotus Evora (342 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 1947 Austin 16. (146 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2009 Lotus Evora will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1947 Austin 16.
Compare all specifications:
1947 Austin 16 | 2009 Lotus Evora | |
Make | Austin | Lotus |
Model | 16 | Evora |
Year Released | 1947 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 342 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 121 km/hour | 252 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1230 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2580 mm |