1947 Austin 16 vs. 2011 Daihatsu Sirion
To start off, 2011 Daihatsu Sirion is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Austin 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Austin 16 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1947 Austin 16 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Daihatsu Sirion (69 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1947 Austin 16. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Daihatsu Sirion should accelerate faster than 1947 Austin 16.
Because 2011 Daihatsu Sirion is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1947 Austin 16. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Daihatsu Sirion will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1947 Austin 16 (146 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Daihatsu Sirion. (94 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1947 Austin 16 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Daihatsu Sirion.
Compare all specifications:
| 1947 Austin 16 | 2011 Daihatsu Sirion | |
| Make | Austin | Daihatsu |
| Model | 16 | Sirion |
| Year Released | 1947 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2200 cc | 998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 63 HP | 69 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.4 mm | 71.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 6.8:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
