1947 Austin A 110 vs. 1950 Jeep CJ3A
To start off, 1950 Jeep CJ3A is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Austin A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Austin A 110 would be higher. At 3,460 cc (6 cylinders), 1947 Austin A 110 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1947 Austin A 110 weights approximately 815 kg more than 1950 Jeep CJ3A.
Because 1950 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1947 Austin A 110. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1950 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1947 Austin A 110 | 1950 Jeep CJ3A | |
Make | Austin | Jeep |
Model | A 110 | CJ3A |
Year Released | 1947 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3460 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 59 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1925 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2040 mm |