1947 Austin A 110 vs. 1962 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1962 Nissan Cedric is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Austin A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Austin A 110 would be higher. At 3,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1947 Austin A 110 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1947 Austin A 110 (124 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1947 Austin A 110 should accelerate faster than 1962 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1947 Austin A 110 weights approximately 1045 kg more than 1962 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1947 Austin A 110 (287 Nm) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm). This means 1947 Austin A 110 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1947 Austin A 110 | 1962 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Austin | Nissan |
| Model | A 110 | Cedric |
| Year Released | 1947 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3992 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 287 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1975 kg | 930 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2540 mm |
