1947 Austin A 110 vs. 2008 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2008 Jeep Compass is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Austin A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Austin A 110 would be higher. At 3,460 cc (6 cylinders), 1947 Austin A 110 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Compass weights approximately 53 kg more than 1947 Austin A 110.
Because 2008 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1947 Austin A 110. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1947 Austin A 110 | 2008 Jeep Compass | |
| Make | Austin | Jeep |
| Model | A 110 | Compass |
| Year Released | 1947 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3460 cc | 2360 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 173 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1925 kg | 1978 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2640 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 51 L |
