1947 Austin A 110 vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Austin A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Austin A 110 would be higher. At 3,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1947 Austin A 110 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1947 Austin A 110. (124 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1947 Austin A 110.
Because 1947 Austin A 110 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1947 Austin A 110. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1947 Austin A 110 (287 Nm) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (167 Nm). This means 1947 Austin A 110 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
1947 Austin A 110 | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | A 110 | 6 |
Year Released | 1947 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3992 cc | 2487 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 287 Nm | 167 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1850 mm |