1947 Austin A 110 vs. 2009 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2009 Nissan Micra is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Austin A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Austin A 110 would be higher. At 3,460 cc (6 cylinders), 1947 Austin A 110 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1947 Austin A 110 weights approximately 483 kg more than 2009 Nissan Micra.
Because 1947 Austin A 110 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1947 Austin A 110. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1947 Austin A 110 | 2009 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | A 110 | Micra |
Year Released | 1947 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3460 cc | 1386 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 87 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1925 kg | 1442 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 46 L |