1947 Austin A 110 vs. 2010 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2010 Ford Ranger is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Austin A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Austin A 110 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1947 Austin A 110. (124 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1947 Austin A 110.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Ranger (322 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1947 Austin A 110. (287 Nm). This means 2010 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1947 Austin A 110.
Compare all specifications:
| 1947 Austin A 110 | 2010 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Austin | Ford |
| Model | A 110 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1947 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3992 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 207 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 287 Nm | 322 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5171 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1763 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1684 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 3193 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 74 L |
