1947 Austin A 110 vs. 2010 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2010 Jeep Compass is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Austin A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Austin A 110 would be higher. At 3,460 cc (6 cylinders), 1947 Austin A 110 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1947 Austin A 110 weights approximately 531 kg more than 2010 Jeep Compass.
Because 1947 Austin A 110 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1947 Austin A 110. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Compass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1947 Austin A 110 | 2010 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Austin | Jeep |
Model | A 110 | Compass |
Year Released | 1947 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3460 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 172 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1925 kg | 1394 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4404 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1656 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2634 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 51 L |