1947 Austin A 110 vs. 2010 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2010 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Austin A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Austin A 110 would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1947 Austin A 110 weights approximately 210 kg more than 2010 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2010 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1947 Austin A 110. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1947 Austin A 110 | 2010 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Austin | Jeep |
| Model | A 110 | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1947 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3460 cc | 3800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 205 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1925 kg | 1715 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4138 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2103 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2423 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 70 L |
