1947 Austin A 125 vs. 1960 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1960 Cadillac 62 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Austin A 125. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Austin A 125 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac 62 (197 HP) has 72 more horse power than 1947 Austin A 125. (125 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1947 Austin A 125. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 200 kg more than 1947 Austin A 125. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1947 Austin A 125 | 1960 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | A 125 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1947 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3990 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 125 HP | 197 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 2200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 3310 mm |
