1947 Austin A 125 vs. 2009 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Austin A 125. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Austin A 125 would be higher. At 3,990 cc (6 cylinders), 1947 Austin A 125 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (263 HP) has 138 more horse power than 1947 Austin A 125. (125 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1947 Austin A 125. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1947 Austin A 125 weights approximately 365 kg more than 2009 Cadillac CTS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1947 Austin A 125 | 2009 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | A 125 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1947 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3990 cc | 3599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 125 HP | 263 HP |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 6.8:1 | 10.2:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1635 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2890 mm |
