1947 Austin A 125 vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Austin A 125. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Austin A 125 would be higher. At 3,990 cc (6 cylinders), 1947 Austin A 125 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac CTS (270 HP) has 145 more horse power than 1947 Austin A 125. (125 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1947 Austin A 125. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1947 Austin A 125 weights approximately 304 kg more than 2010 Cadillac CTS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1947 Austin A 125 | 2010 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | A 125 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1947 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3990 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 125 HP | 270 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2060 kg | 1756 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 4867 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1842 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 2880 mm |
