1947 Austin A 40 vs. 1952 Buick 40
To start off, 1952 Buick 40 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Buick 40 (118 HP) has 79 more horse power than 1947 Austin A 40. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1947 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Buick 40 weights approximately 670 kg more than 1947 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1947 Austin A 40 | 1952 Buick 40 | |
| Make | Austin | Buick |
| Model | A 40 | 40 |
| Year Released | 1947 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1200 cc | 4066 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 39 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 65.5 mm | 78.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 89 mm | 104.8 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 965 kg | 1635 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 3090 mm |
