1947 Austin A 40 vs. 1962 Skoda 1202
To start off, 1962 Skoda 1202 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,221 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Skoda 1202 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Skoda 1202 (44 HP) has 5 more horse power than 1947 Austin A 40. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Skoda 1202 should accelerate faster than 1947 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Skoda 1202 weights approximately 140 kg more than 1947 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1947 Austin A 40 | 1962 Skoda 1202 | |
| Make | Austin | Skoda |
| Model | A 40 | 1202 |
| Year Released | 1947 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1200 cc | 1221 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 39 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 65.5 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 89 mm | 75 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 965 kg | 1105 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2690 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 30 L |
