1947 Austin A 40 vs. 1962 Triumph Vitesse
To start off, 1962 Triumph Vitesse is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,596 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Triumph Vitesse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Triumph Vitesse (70 HP) has 31 more horse power than 1947 Austin A 40. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Triumph Vitesse should accelerate faster than 1947 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1947 Austin A 40 weights approximately 59 kg more than 1962 Triumph Vitesse.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1947 Austin A 40 | 1962 Triumph Vitesse | |
Make | Austin | Triumph |
Model | A 40 | Vitesse |
Year Released | 1947 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 70 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 65.5 mm | 66.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89 mm | 76 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 114 km/hour | 140 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 965 kg | 906 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2330 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 29 L |