1947 Austin A 40 vs. 1980 Toyota Carina
To start off, 1980 Toyota Carina is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,586 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Toyota Carina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Toyota Carina (88 HP) has 49 more horse power than 1947 Austin A 40. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Toyota Carina should accelerate faster than 1947 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1947 Austin A 40 weights approximately 10 kg more than 1980 Toyota Carina.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1947 Austin A 40 | 1980 Toyota Carina | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | A 40 | Carina |
Year Released | 1947 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 88 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 65.5 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89 mm | 70 mm |
Top Speed | 114 km/hour | 165 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 965 kg | 955 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 61 L |