1947 Austin A 40 vs. 1982 Autobianchi A 112
To start off, 1982 Autobianchi A 112 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1947 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1947 Austin A 40 weights approximately 305 kg more than 1982 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 1947 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1947 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1947 Austin A 40 | 1982 Autobianchi A 112 | |
Make | Austin | Autobianchi |
Model | A 40 | A 112 |
Year Released | 1947 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 965 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 114 km/hour | 145 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 965 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 3280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2050 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 30 L |