1947 Austin A 40 vs. 1992 Nissan Micra
To start off, 1992 Nissan Micra is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1947 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Nissan Micra (49 HP) has 10 more horse power than 1947 Austin A 40. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 1947 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1947 Austin A 40 weights approximately 300 kg more than 1992 Nissan Micra.
Because 1947 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1947 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1947 Austin A 40 | 1992 Nissan Micra | |
| Make | Austin | Nissan |
| Model | A 40 | Micra |
| Year Released | 1947 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1200 cc | 988 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 39 HP | 49 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 965 kg | 665 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 3770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2310 mm |
