1947 Austin A 40 vs. 2008 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2008 Nissan Rogue is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Nissan Rogue is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Nissan Rogue (170 HP) has 131 more horse power than 1947 Austin A 40. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Rogue should accelerate faster than 1947 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Rogue weights approximately 165 kg more than 1947 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Nissan Rogue is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1947 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Rogue will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1947 Austin A 40 | 2008 Nissan Rogue | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | A 40 | Rogue |
Year Released | 1947 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 2488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 170 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 965 kg | 1130 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 60 L |