1947 Austin A 40 vs. 2009 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 3,175 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (215 HP) has 176 more horse power than 1947 Austin A 40. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1947 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 825 kg more than 1947 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1947 Austin A 40 | 2009 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | A 40 | CTS |
Year Released | 1947 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 3175 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 215 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 65.5 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89 mm | 88 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 114 km/hour | 238 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 965 kg | 1790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 68 L |