1947 Austin A 40 vs. 2011 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2011 Honda CR-Z is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Honda CR-Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Honda CR-Z (122 HP) has 83 more horse power than 1947 Austin A 40. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Honda CR-Z should accelerate faster than 1947 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Honda CR-Z weights approximately 237 kg more than 1947 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1947 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1947 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Honda CR-Z, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1947 Austin A 40 | 2011 Honda CR-Z | |
Make | Austin | Honda |
Model | A 40 | CR-Z |
Year Released | 1947 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 122 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 965 kg | 1202 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4079 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2436 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 40 L |