1947 Austin A 40 vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 65 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V (556 HP) has 517 more horse power than 1947 Austin A 40. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1947 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 950 kg more than 1947 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1947 Austin A 40 | 2012 Cadillac CTS-V | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | A 40 | CTS-V |
| Year Released | 1947 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1200 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 39 HP | 556 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 965 kg | 1915 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4788 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1882 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1422 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 68 L |
