1947 Austin A 40 vs. 2012 Mazda 3
To start off, 2012 Mazda 3 is newer by 65 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda 3 (167 HP) has 128 more horse power than 1947 Austin A 40. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1947 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda 3 weights approximately 418 kg more than 1947 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1947 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1947 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1947 Austin A 40 | 2012 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | A 40 | 3 |
Year Released | 1947 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 167 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 965 kg | 1383 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4506 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 60 L |