1947 Bristol 450 vs. 1951 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1951 Cadillac 62 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 5,422 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Cadillac 62 (160 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1947 Bristol 450. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1951 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1947 Bristol 450. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1022 kg more than 1947 Bristol 450. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1947 Bristol 450 | 1951 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
Model | 450 | 62 |
Year Released | 1947 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 5422 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1752 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2050 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3210 mm |