1947 Bristol 450 vs. 1959 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1959 Cadillac 62 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 6,381 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (325 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 1947 Bristol 450. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1947 Bristol 450. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1488 kg more than 1947 Bristol 450. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1947 Bristol 450 | 1959 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
Model | 450 | 62 |
Year Released | 1947 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 6381 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 325 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 2218 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 75 L |