1947 Bristol 450 vs. 1968 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1968 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1947 Bristol 450 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1947 Bristol 450 (153 HP) has 59 more horse power than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. (94 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1947 Bristol 450 should accelerate faster than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 210 kg more than 1947 Bristol 450.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1947 Bristol 450 | 1968 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Bristol | Mazda |
| Model | 450 | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1947 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1964 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 94 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1170 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 57 L |
