1947 Bristol 450 vs. 1980 Lotus Eclat
To start off, 1980 Lotus Eclat is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 2,174 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Lotus Eclat is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Lotus Eclat (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1947 Bristol 450. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Lotus Eclat should accelerate faster than 1947 Bristol 450. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Lotus Eclat weights approximately 374 kg more than 1947 Bristol 450. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1947 Bristol 450 | 1980 Lotus Eclat | |
| Make | Bristol | Lotus |
| Model | 450 | Eclat |
| Year Released | 1947 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2174 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1104 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1210 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2490 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 67 L |
