1947 Bristol 450 vs. 2002 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2002 Toyota Tundra is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 4,698 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota Tundra (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1947 Bristol 450. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1947 Bristol 450. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 193 kg more than 1947 Bristol 450. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1947 Bristol 450 | 2002 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Bristol | Toyota |
| Model | 450 | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1947 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 245 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 923 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3270 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 70 L |
