1947 Bristol 450 vs. 2006 Smart ForFour
To start off, 2006 Smart ForFour is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1947 Bristol 450 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1947 Bristol 450 (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 2006 Smart ForFour. (75 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1947 Bristol 450 should accelerate faster than 2006 Smart ForFour.
Because 1947 Bristol 450 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1947 Bristol 450. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Smart ForFour, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1947 Bristol 450 | 2006 Smart ForFour | |
| Make | Bristol | Smart |
| Model | 450 | ForFour |
| Year Released | 1947 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1123 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 75 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 22 L |
