1947 Bristol 450 vs. 2009 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2009 Ford Ranger is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1947 Bristol 450 (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ranger. (143 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1947 Bristol 450 should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Ranger weights approximately 236 kg more than 1947 Bristol 450.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1947 Bristol 450 | 2009 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Bristol | Ford |
Model | 450 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1947 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 64 L |