1947 Buick 40 vs. 1969 Cadillac Calais
To start off, 1969 Cadillac Calais is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Buick 40 would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac Calais (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1947 Buick 40. (142 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1947 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 230 kg more than 1947 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1947 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1947 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Calais, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1947 Buick 40 | 1969 Cadillac Calais | |
Make | Buick | Cadillac |
Model | 40 | Calais |
Year Released | 1947 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5249 cc | 7734 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 228 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1845 kg | 2075 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 3300 mm |