1947 Buick 40 vs. 2000 Ford Puma
To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,249 cc (8 cylinders), 1947 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Puma (153 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1947 Buick 40. (142 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1947 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1947 Buick 40 weights approximately 570 kg more than 2000 Ford Puma.
Because 1947 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1947 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1947 Buick 40 | 2000 Ford Puma | |
| Make | Buick | Ford |
| Model | 40 | Puma |
| Year Released | 1947 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5249 cc | 1679 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 142 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1845 kg | 1275 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2450 mm |
