1947 Buick 40 vs. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,249 cc (8 cylinders), 1947 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP) has 140 more horse power than 1947 Buick 40. (142 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1947 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 595 kg more than 1947 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1947 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1947 Buick 40 | 2002 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Buick | Land Rover |
| Model | 40 | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1947 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5249 cc | 4398 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 142 HP | 282 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1845 kg | 2440 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2550 mm |
