1947 Buick 40 vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,249 cc (8 cylinders), 1947 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1947 Buick 40 (142 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (83 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1947 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1947 Buick 40 weights approximately 690 kg more than 2009 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1947 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1947 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1947 Buick 40 | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Buick | Mazda |
Model | 40 | 3 |
Year Released | 1947 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5249 cc | 1347 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1845 kg | 1155 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2650 mm |