1947 Cadillac 62 vs. 2008 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2008 Jeep Compass is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,675 cc (8 cylinders), 1947 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1947 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 31 kg more than 2008 Jeep Compass.
Because 2008 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1947 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1947 Cadillac 62 | 2008 Jeep Compass | |
| Make | Cadillac | Jeep |
| Model | 62 | Compass |
| Year Released | 1947 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5675 cc | 2358 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 172 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1860 kg | 1829 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2640 mm |
