1947 Ford Pilot vs. 2003 Mazda 3
To start off, 2003 Mazda 3 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Ford Pilot. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Ford Pilot would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1947 Ford Pilot is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 3 (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1947 Ford Pilot. (85 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1947 Ford Pilot. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1947 Ford Pilot weights approximately 312 kg more than 2003 Mazda 3.
Because 1947 Ford Pilot is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1947 Ford Pilot. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1947 Ford Pilot | 2003 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Pilot | 3 |
Year Released | 1947 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1452 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2610 mm |