1947 Ford Pilot vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 66 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Ford Pilot. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Ford Pilot would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1947 Ford Pilot is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 229 more horse power than 1947 Ford Pilot. (85 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1947 Ford Pilot. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 405 kg more than 1947 Ford Pilot. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 1947 Ford Pilot has manual transmission. 1947 Ford Pilot will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1947 Ford Pilot | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Ford | Cadillac |
| Model | Pilot | CTS |
| Year Released | 1947 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 314 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 77.8 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 95.3 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 6.2:1 | 11.3 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1452 kg | 1857 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4877 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1842 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2880 mm |
