1947 Ford Taunus vs. 1969 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1969 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 1,962 cc, 1969 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP) has 59 more horse power than 1947 Ford Taunus. (34 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1947 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 110 kg more than 1947 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1947 Ford Taunus | 1969 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Taunus | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1947 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1170 cc | 1962 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 93 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 830 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4110 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1170 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2210 mm |
