1947 GAZ M20 vs. 2003 Mazda 2
To start off, 2003 Mazda 2 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 GAZ M20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 GAZ M20 would be higher. At 2,120 cc (4 cylinders), 1947 GAZ M20 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 2 (81 HP) has 30 more horse power than 1947 GAZ M20. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1947 GAZ M20. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1947 GAZ M20 weights approximately 380 kg more than 2003 Mazda 2.
Because 1947 GAZ M20 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1947 GAZ M20. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 2 (141 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1947 GAZ M20. (125 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2003 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1947 GAZ M20.
Compare all specifications:
1947 GAZ M20 | 2003 Mazda 2 | |
Make | GAZ | Mazda |
Model | M20 | 2 |
Year Released | 1947 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 2120 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 81 HP |
Torque | 125 Nm | 141 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2500 mm |