1947 Jaguar Mark IV vs. 2010 Renault Clio
To start off, 2010 Renault Clio is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Jaguar Mark IV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Jaguar Mark IV would be higher. At 1,776 cc (4 cylinders), 1947 Jaguar Mark IV is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1947 Jaguar Mark IV weights approximately 170 kg more than 2010 Renault Clio.
Because 1947 Jaguar Mark IV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1947 Jaguar Mark IV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1947 Jaguar Mark IV | 2010 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Jaguar | Renault |
| Model | Mark IV | Clio |
| Year Released | 1947 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1776 cc | 1460 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 81 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1175 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 2030 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2580 mm |
